The second IS lesson was all about the web and new media, and I had to enter a dicussion about copyright. Well, I mean, everyone knows what copyright is, so why? The discussion actually included a video telling us the parts that are included in infringing copyright, like a technology, copying a whole book, and even downloading pictures from the internet. The culprit, Michael, in the video had not only infringed copyright in all those categories, he had also used them in his project for a proposal to get promoted.He got fired in the end, before he found that it had been a dream. This video served as a deterrence to those whose fingers are at the edge of clicking the mouse and making a mistake, and a warning to those who had not thought of the idea.
I also participated in another forum of the two versions of the web, and a participant had stated that web 2.0 was better as it prevented face-to-face conflicts. However, sometimes, insulting websites may hurt the pride if someone, and cause him/her to commit suicide, which may be worse than face-to-face conflicts.
That's about all. See you next week!
How's the posts so far?
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Thursday, January 14, 2010
Intro to IS
I've never known anything about the versions of the web, or anything like the IP. So I was surprised to learn that I had missed so much when I attended my first IS (infocomm studies) lesson in school today. I could imagine how blank my face was when my teacher explained all about the IP and the versions of the web. But, of course, it was extremely easy to understand it and I finally got what IP was all about, and the difference between web 1.0 and 2.0. Even for someone like me whose computer knowledge was nothing to sneeze at, the concept of the IP was easy to understand. The IP was the internet pretocol, and it came in the form of numbers. However, people found it hard to remember, and so, through a series of changes, it evolved into today's URL. The versions of the Web took a bit longer, which, the difference was, Web 1.0 only allowed the creator to add information into the website, and the public could only see, while Web 2.0 allowed the creator AND the public to add in information and help make the website more informative. It was complicated, but still, I somehow or another managed to understand it. (With countless silent sniggers from my friend, of course) I have to get the hang of it though, or I'll never hear the end of it from my friend. Gotta run. G'day! ;)
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)

